Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jeffrey David Walker v. Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey David Walker
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hiett et al v. Housing Authority of Stanislaus County et al
as 1:2022cv00612
Plaintiff:
Deedee Hiett and Ramon J. Magdaleno, Jr.
Defendant:
Housing Authority of Stanislaus County, Barbara Kauss, Mildred C. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10370
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Singh et al
as 2:2017cv02451
Plaintiff:
David Walker Johnson
Defendant:
Charanvir Singh, Yuba City Police Department, The City of Yuba City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
David Walker , Ursula Massey , James Massey and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation and Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. City of Atwater et al
as 1:2016cv01636
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson
Defendant:
City of Atwater , Frank Pietro , Samuel Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. City of Atwater et al
as 1:2016at00897
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson
Defendant:
City of Atwater , Frank Pietro , Samuel Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
