Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Zuffa, LLC v. Aaron Barnes et al
as 5:2023cv02600
Petitioner:
ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship, Aaron Barnes Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of WOLFE PAK, INC. d/b/a KUSH ON 66, David Wolfe Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of WOLFE PAK, INC. d/b/a KUSH ON 66 and others
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC doing business as Ultimate Fighting Championship
Defendant:
Aaron Barnes, Ian Asmundson and Wolfe Pak, Inc. doing business as Kush On 66
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
(HC) Ramirez v. Aguilar et al
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Narciso Ramirez
Respondent:
Mark S. Aguilar, Judge David Wolf, Judge Eric Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Wolf et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
David Wolf, Brian M. McNamara and Kern County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramin Salari v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv07258
Plaintiff:
Ramin Salari
Defendant:
Michele Gilmer, Susan Schwartz, Craig Hum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Gaddy v. Superior Court of California et al
as 1:2021cv01270
Respondent:
H.A. Staley, Superior Court of California, County of Kern (Delano-McFarland) and others
Petitioner:
Michael Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark McNeil v. Seth Fogel et al
as 2:2014cv08030
Defendant:
Investigator David Bermejo, Investigator David Bermejo, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Mark McNeil
Purdum et al v. Wolfe
as 4:2013cv04816
Plaintiff:
Barrett Purdum , Mike Armenta and Michael Maher
Defendant:
David Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
David Wolf et al v. Red Bull GMBH et al
as 2:2013cv01444
Plaintiff:
Miguel Almaraz and David Wolf
Defendant:
Red Bull Distribution Company Inc, Red Bull GMBH and Red Bull North America Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
