Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 130
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2012cv01270
Defendant: CR Bard Inc
Plaintiff: Davol, Inc. and Thomas A Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00817
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Plaintiff: Kate-Lynne Ruth Crawford, Ronald Lee Crawford and Teresa L. Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hicks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00749
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: Steven Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Nicole Cruse v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03238
Defendant: C R Bard Inc, Davol Inc and Does
Plaintiff: Nicole Cruse
Casanave v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05308
Plaintiff: Angela Casanave
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and W.L. Gore Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00978
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Eyth v. Davol, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05024
Plaintiff: Bernard Eyth
Defendant: Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Angie Moreno v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07106
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. and Does
Plaintiff: Angie Moreno
Modrow v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01310
Plaintiff: Thelma Modrow
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EHLKE v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00882
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: David EHLKE
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?