Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Kelly v. ORANGE et al
as 8:2024cv00933
Plaintiff: Ace Kuumealoha Kelly
Defendant: COUNTY OF ORANGE, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ace Kelley v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00929
Plaintiff: Ace Kelley
Defendant: County of Orange, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victor J. De La Rosa v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff: Victor J. De La Rosa
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02290
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Carlos De La Rosa v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: Carlos De La Rosa
Defendant: Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06461
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Soto De La Rosa v. Garland
as 23-3451
Petitioner: JOSE ISABEL SOTO DE LA ROSA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aguirre v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01980
Plaintiff: Wbaldo De La Rosa Aguirre
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
De La Rosa Lemus De Herrera, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2961
Petitioner: WENDY MARISOL DE LA ROSA LEMUS DE HERRERA, NESTOR AARON HERRERA DE LA ROSA, HAMILTON SAMUEL HERRERA DE LA ROSA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
De La Rosa v. Leprino Foods Company
as 1:2023cv01321
Plaintiff: Isaiah De La Rosa
Defendant: Leprino Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?