Cases 1 - 10 of 39
DEJESUS v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
ALEXY DEJESUS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER NIGEL I. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLIESATH v. DEJESUS
as 5:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
JADIN MICHAEL BLIESATH
Defendant:
OFFICER MISSAEL DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 5:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant:
LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS JR. et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2023cv03424
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. DEJESUS JR. and CAROLINE MORALES
Defendant:
LOUIS SANTIAGO, MATTHEW KARNISH, ALEXANDER BOEHM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
DEJESUS v. COTTON et al
as 2:2022cv06107
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
RICHARD COTTON, JOAQIN D. LIGUAS and ALLIANCE ONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Service Employees International Union, Local 668 et al
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Magdalena DeJesus
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union, Local 668 and Stephen Catanese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS v. LUCEY et al
as 5:2021cv05469
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
BILL LUCEY and MARTIN GARICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DEJESUS v. DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS et al
as 2:2021cv18413
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
DIVISION NEW JERSEY CIVIL RIGHTS, ELIZABETH M RUSSIAW, WALESKA LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
