Cases 31 - 40 of 79
ANDREWS v. PRIEBS et al
as 3:2018cv13306
Defendant:
SERGEANT GOOD, OFFICER D. PRIEBS, D. HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GUILLE v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01472
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, DAVID RICHARDS, RAYMOND ROYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. VERINT SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2017cv13102
Plaintiff:
JOSE DEJESUS
Defendant:
VERINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KIDZ KASTLE et al
as 2:2017cv12490
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KIDZ KASTLE, CHARMAINE DEJESUS and JOSE A. DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2017cv10687
Petitioner:
QUINCY C. BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MARCOS DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CONCIO v. CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv06776
Plaintiff:
FRANK D. CONCIO
Defendant:
CSX INTERMODAL TERMINALS, INC. and RICHARD DEJESUS JIMENEZ MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04589
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEJESUS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, IMERYS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinton et al v. Johnson & Johnson,Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02394
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hinton , Allen Abernethy , Billie Albers and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
RIVERA et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv09320
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO RIVERA and KACHINA RIVERA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , DIVISION OF STATE POLICE , BRIAN DEJESUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
