Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Honeycutt, FNU Farrish, Timothy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Moe & D's Restaurant & Grill, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Moe & D's Restaurant & Grill, LLC, Michael Deloach, Steve Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
DELOACH v. JONES, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD DELOACH
Defendant:
HAYWOOD JONES and DEFENDER AMMUNITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Greenberg v. Browning et al
as 4:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
E. F. Greenberg
Defendant:
Michael G. Browning, Lynn J. Good, Daniel R. DiMicco and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DeLoach v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Stanley E. DeLoach
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
DeLoach v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stanley E. DeLoach
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bank of the Ozarks v. DKK Development Company et al
as 1:2013mc00030
Plaintiff:
Bank of the Ozarks
Defendant:
DKK Development Company, M. Frank Deloach, III, William C. Killgallon and others
Galaton v. Johnson et al
as 4:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Martin Galaton
Defendant:
William D. Johnson, John H. Mullin, III, E. Marie McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galaton v. Johnson et al
as 5:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
Martin Galaton
Defendant:
William D. Johnson , John H. Mullin, III , E. Marie McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
