Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Jones v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Kevin Johnson and Jeremiah Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01798
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Fiero, Ms. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eduardo Navejar v. Deanna Brookhart
as 23-1742
Petitioner:
EDUARDO NAVEJAR
Respondent:
DEANNA BROOKHART, Warden
Jeryme Morgan v. Deanna Brookhart
as 23-1614
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERYME MORGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DEANNA BROOKHART
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Luking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eitenmiller et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eitenmiller, Nina Eitenmiller, Gregory Gurski and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jordan v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv03041
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lori Cunningham, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv02908
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lt Livingston, C/O Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv02837
Plaintiff:
Raphael Taylor
Defendant:
State of Illinois, District II Chicago Police Station, District II Chicago Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv02816
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully, Jr
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Gilreath, D Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
