Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv00359
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Rodriguez
Respondent:
Deborah G Cockrell and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Collier et al
as 6:2018cv00435
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, Carol Monroe, Jr., Deborah G Cockrell and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Glen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Monroe et al
as 1:2018cv00384
Defendant:
Jamadre L Encoe, Carol E Monroe, Charles O Meador and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Mobley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Monroe et al
as 6:2018cv00403
Defendant:
Jamadre L Encoe, Carol E Monroe, Charles O Meador and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Mobley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Peters v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 18-40566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GEOFFREY PETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DEBORAH G. COCKRELL, THOMAS R. TAYLOR and others
Robinson v. Meador et al
as 6:2018cv00207
Plaintiff:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Deborah G Cockrell, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Meador et al
as 3:2018cv01143
Plaintiff:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Deborah G Cockrell, Pam Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Deborah G Cockrell, Thomas R Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Davis et al
as 6:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
Charles Freeman
Defendant:
Lorie Davis , Vance L Drum , Deborah G Cockrell and others
Amicu:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
