Cases 61 - 70 of 100
George v. Toney et al
as 4:2019cv00589
Defendant:
John Hutton, Finch, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Kendrick George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dempsey v. Toney
as 2:2019cv00297
Defendant:
Deborah Toney and Steve Marshall
Petitioner:
Timothy F Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Portis v. Walker et al
as 7:2019cv00253
Defendant:
Kenneth Smith, Deborah Toney and Shannon Walker
Plaintiff:
Wymon leotis Frazier Portis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culver v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Deborah Tony, Steven T. Marshall and Deborah Toney
Plaintiff:
Demetrius A. Culver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv01023
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall and Deborah Toney
Plaintiff:
George Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duncan v. Toney et al
as 7:2018cv01174
Petitioner:
James Randall Duncan
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Deborah Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Nathaniel Jackson, Jr
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility, Willie Thomas, Deborah Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Bibb Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2017cv00301
Plaintiff:
Mark Caleb English
Defendant:
Bibb Correctional Facility, Willie Thomas, Deborah Toney and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrance v. Hutton et al
as 7:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Ardragust D. Torrance
Defendant:
John Hutton, Willie Thomas, Willie Bennett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hutton et al
as 7:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
Glen D Johnson
Defendant:
John Hutton, Willie Thomas, Deborah Toney and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
