Cases 1 - 10 of 11
UPTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv00430
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LYNN UPTON
RUSHING v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02007
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LYNN RUSHING
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emenhizer v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Debra Lynn Emenhizer
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GOOSLIN
as 5:2014cv06619
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEBRA LYNNE GOOSLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
HOLT et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04185
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOLT , RAY PINNEY , RANDALL BEISLER and others
Receiver:
JACQUELINE SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARKINS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LYNNE HARKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
THOMAS v. BOROUGH OF SWISSVALE et al
as 2:2009cv00996
Plaintiff:
DONNA J. THOMAS and DONNA J. THOMAS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SWISSVALE, DEBRA LYNN INDOVINA-AKERLY, CHARLES WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLYMER v. BEVERLY HALL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv01367
Plaintiff:
RONALD SWINBURNE CLYMER
Defendant:
BEVERLY HALL CORPORATION, THE IMPERIAL COUNCIL AND VENERATED ORDER OF MAGI, THE SPIRIT OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF LIGHT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JEFFERS et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66650
Plaintiff:
MELVIN LEON JEFFERS and DEBRA LYNN JEFFERS
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
