Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
James Reece v. Sumner County Tennessee, et al
as 10-5368
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES RICHARDSON REECE
Defendant - Appellee: SUMNER COUNTY TENNESSEE, JAMES HUNTER, in his capacity as Judge of General Sessions Court I, C.L. BUCK RODGERS, in his capacity as Judge of 18th Circuit Court and others
Reece v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01049
Petitioner: James Richardson Reece
Respondent: Sumner County, Tennessee, James Hunter, C.L. "Buck" Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Gabble Mitchell v. Philip Bredesen, et al
as 09-6299
Plaintiff - Appellant: GABBLE LEE MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee: PHILIP BREDESEN, Governor, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Commissioner, ROBERTA J. ANDERSON, SMS and others
Ricky Cook v. James Hunter, et al
as 09-6194
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICKY LEE COOK
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES HUNTER, Judge, DEE DAVID GAY, Judge and WILLIAM G. LAMBERTH, II, D.A.
Mitchell v. Bredesen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00897
Plaintiff: Gabble Lee Mitchell
Defendant: Phil Bredesen, George M. Little, Roberta J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Hunter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00786
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Cook
Defendant: James Hunter, Dee David Gay and William G. Lamberth, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Cook v. William Lamberth, II, et al
as 09-5798
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICKY LEE COOK
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM G. LAMBERTH, II and DEE DAVID GAY
Cook v. Lamberth et al
as 3:2009cv00434
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Cook
Defendant: William G. Lamberth, II and Dee David Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Lamberth et al
as 3:2009mc00098
Plaintiff: Ricky Lee Cook
Defendant: William G. Lamberth, II and Dee David Gay

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?