Cases 1 - 10 of 18
None v. Garland
as 24-770
Petitioner:
POOJA NONE, KANISHKA NONE, KAMAKSHI NONE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Sidewalk Blues LLC et al. v. Pearl Global Industries Limited et al.
as 1:2020cv03745
Plaintiff:
Ira Rothbaum and Sidewalk Blues LLC
Defendant:
Deepak Kumar Seth, Pearl Global Limited, Pearl Global Industries Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kapur et al v. Knauf Insulation GmbH et al
as 2:2018cv06691
Plaintiff:
Deepak Kumar Kapur and Neeraj Kapur
Defendant:
Knauf Plasterboard (Tanjin) Co., Ltd., Knauf Insulation, Inc., Knauf Insulation GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kapur et al v. Knauf Insulation GmbH et al
as FLM/8:18-cv-01330
Plaintiff:
Deepak Kumar Kapur and Neeraj Kapur
Defendant:
Knauf Insulation GmbH , Knauf Insulation LLC , Knauf Insulation S.P.R.L. and others
Kapur et al v. Knauf Insulation GmbH et al
as 8:2018cv01330
Plaintiff:
Deepak Kumar Kapur and Neeraj Kapur
Defendant:
Knauf Insulation GmbH , Knauf Insulation LLC , Knauf Insulation S.P.R.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
