Cases 1 - 10 of 1,145
Shah El v. DeKalb County et al
as 3:2024cv50135
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Grant Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilstrap v. DeKalb County Police Department
as 1:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Sammy Eugene Gilstrap
Defendant:
DeKalb County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Dekalb County Magistrate Court
as 1:2024mi00025
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Dekalb County Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Glass v. Dekalb County Magistrate Court et al
as 1:2024mi00026
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Dekalb County Magistrate Court and Davyd L. Mincey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lomax v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dialo Lomax
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and DeKalb County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moussa Diarra v. Bell, et al
as 24-10944
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NRA DIARRA
Defendant:
BELL, HOOD and DEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
