Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SRM Global Fund Limited Partne v. Bear Stearns Companies L.L.C. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-507
Plaintiff - Appellant: SRM Global Master Fund Limited Partnership
Defendant - Appellee: Bear Stearns Companies L.L.C., FKA Bear Stearns Companies Inc., Alan D. Schwartz, Samuel L. Molinaro, Jr. and others
SRM Global Master Fund Limited Partnership v. The Bear Stearns Companies L.L.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02692
Plaintiff: SRM Global Master Fund Limited Partnership
Defendant: The Bear Stearns Companies L.L.C., Alan D. Schwartz, Samuel L. Molinaro, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. et al v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01094
Plaintiff: Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. , Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. , Columbia Pacific Opportunity Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA, Ltd., Deloitte & Touche L.L.P., Antonio Sena and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
as 1:2013cv00418
In_re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
Plaintiff: Capital & Finance Asset Management , Cattolica Partecipazioni S.p.A. , Hermes Focus Asset Management Europe Limited and others
Defendant: Laura J. Sturaitis, Bonlat Financing Corporation, Calisto Tanzi and others
Movant: Ezio Argano
Objector: The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA and The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v. Bank One, N.A., et al
as 1:2012cv07263
Plaintiff: Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
Defendant: Bank One, N.A., BANC ONE CAPITAL MARKETS, INC., Credit Suisse First Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Harold Roucher Trust U/A, et al v. Franklin Bank Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-20291
Movant - Appellant: FRANKLIN LEAD PLAINTIFF GROUP
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD ROUCHER TRUST U/A DTD 09/21/72, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Lead Plaintiff for the Preferred Stock Purchaser Class, PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and JOSEPH PRIBYL
Defendant - Appellee: ANTHONY J. NOCELLA, RUSSELL MCCANN, LEWIS S. RANIERI and others
Young et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2009cv01561
Plaintiff: Jennifer R. Young, Jennifer R. Young, Jennifer R. Young and others
Defendant: Kenneth D. Lewis, John A. Thain, William Barnett, III and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., L.L.C. v. Deloitte & Touche L.L.P.
as 1:2007cv06849
Plaintiff: W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., L.L.C.
Defendant: Deloitte & Touche L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2004md01653
Plaintiff: Gerald K. Smith, Ferri Giampolo, Solotrat and others
Defendant: Grant Thornton International, Credit Suisse First Boston, Credit Suisse Group and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Parmalat S.p.A. and Parmalat S.p.A. Parmalat S.p.A.
Interested Party: Parmalat Brasil S/A
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Grant Thornton LLP
Not Classified By Court: The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA and The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Dianthis S.p.A and Gian Paulo Zini
Petitioner: Ezio Argano
Lead Plaintiff: Capital & Finance Asset Management
In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re: National Century Financial Enterprises Inc Investment Litigation
as 2:2003md01565
Defendant: Bank One National Association, Kuld Corp, Thomas G. Mendell and others
Plaintiff: Donna Schrader, Michael Mahoney, Barbara Poulsen and others
In Re: Fitch Inc, Thomas Mendell, Deloitte & Touche, LLP and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?