Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Demmerick Brown v. T. Coyner
as 23-6888
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY COYNER, Dental Assistant, WERNER WIEDEMANN, Dentist, K. SMITH, Institutional Physician and others
Demmerick Brown v. Karen Stapleton
as 23-6824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN STAPLETON, Disciplinary Unit Manager, L. A. MULLINS, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and BRETT FARMER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Prison Guard Sergeant
Demmerick Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID A. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, GEORGE M. HINKLE and others
Brown v. Coyner et al
as 7:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Denrick Eric Brown, Demmerick Eric Brown and Demmerick E. Brown
Defendant:
T. Coyner, Werner Wiredemann, K. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Denrick Eric Brown, Demmerick Eric Brown and Demmerick E. Brown
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David A. Robinson, George M. Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demmerick Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6903
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMMERICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Denrick Eric Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Brown v. Clark
as 1:2020cv01453
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Petitioner:
Demmerick Eric Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demmerick Brown v. Karen Brown
as 20-6448
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEMMERICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Denrick Eric Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Dir., WENDY BROWN, Classification Mgr. and KAREN D. BROWN, Parole Chairman
Brown v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Petitioner:
Demmerick Eric Brown
Respondent:
Karen D. Brown and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
