Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Trump v. The Wisconsin Elections Commission et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv01785
Defendant:
Commissioner Marge Bostelmann, The Wisconsin Elections Commission, Claire Woodall-Vogg and others
Plaintiff:
Donald J Trump
Amicus Curiae:
Center for Tech and Civic Life and Christine Todd Whitman et al Amici Group
Intervenor Defendant:
Wisconsin State Conference NAACP, Earnestine Moss, Wendell J. Harris, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feehan et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv01771
Plaintiff:
Derrick Van Orden and William Feehan
Defendant:
Wisconsin Elections Commission, Commissioner Ann S Jacobs, Julie M Glancey and others
Petitioner:
James Gesbeck
Amicus Curiae:
Wisconsin State Conference NAACP, Earnestine Moss, Dorothy Harrell and others
Intervenor:
Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Democratic National Committee et al v. Bostelmann, Marge et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
Democratic National Committee and Democratic Party of Wisconsin
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Ann S. Jacobs and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Racine, Tony Evers, Dane County and others
Intervenor:
Wisconsin State Legislature
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Democratic National Committee et al v. Bostelmann, Marge et al
as 3:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
Democratic National Committee and Democratic Party Of Wisconsin
Defendant:
Mark L. Thomsen, Dean Knudson, Ann S. Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.