Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11718
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11654
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00881
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv40215
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sandoval v. Chertoff, et al
as 08-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant: NANCY C. SANDOVAL
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, DENIS C. RIORDAN, Director USCIS Boston District Office, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, Director of the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1607
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10628
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Downer v. Riordan et al
as 3:2008cv00465
Plaintiff: Barry Downer
Defendant: Denis C. Riordan and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10205
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?