Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Curtis Fuller v. Denise Gerth, et al
as 12-2593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER, complaint also names Leon Percival #220239, but he did not sign the compaint
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE GERTH, Case Manager, A-Rus, et al
Fuller #211080 v. Gerth et al
as 2:2012cv00368
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller #211080
Defendant:
Denise Gerth, Denver McBurney, Ann Barsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, C. Deatsman, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller et al v. Heyns
as 2:2012cv12371
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller, Felicia Dyer, Ursula Heard and others
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Patricia Caruso, Sean Lockhart and others
Clark v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv12044
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
T Lindemuth, C Deatsman, Catherine S Bauman and others
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, C. Deatsman, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Shavers v. David Bergh, et al
as 11-2079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERGH, Warden, in his Personal Capacity, LLOYD RAPELJE, Deputy Warden, in his Personal Capacity, DENISE GERTH, Case Manager, ARUS, in her Personal Capacity and others
Curtis Fuller v. Denise Gerth, et al
as 11-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE GERTH, Case Manager, ANN BARSCH, PEGGY ANN CARBERRY and others
Fuller #211080 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller #211080
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis M. Straub, Sean Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leon Percival v. Denise Gerth
as 11-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON PERCIVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE GERTH, Case Manager, Assistant Resident Supervisor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
