Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Maher v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv06506
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dennis P. Maher
Defendant:
Ralph C Johnson and Global Factors, LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Mary E. Maher Residuary Trust
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Reiber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dennis P. Reiber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilmington PT Corp. v. Bonilla et al
as 1:2019cv02684
Defendant:
NYC Parking Violations Bureau, NYC Environmental Control Board, NY State Department of Taxation & Finance and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmington PT Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Mawra et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11839
Plaintiff:
Ronald Natole, Peter Morris, Kevin McDevitt and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Sedor et al v. Town of Owasco, New York
as 5:2018cv00322
Plaintiff:
Michele Sedor and Dennis P. Sedor
Defendant:
Town of Owasco, New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cambron v. Carnhill Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05909
Plaintiff:
Alfonso F. Cambron
Defendant:
Carnhill Inc. and Dennis P. O'Hearn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DeStephano v. Wold et al
as 1:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Julian DeStephano
Defendant:
Mary Kate Wold, John Ryan, Jeff Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Buczek v. Glascott et al
as 1:2016cv00684
Petitioner:
Shane C. Buczek
Defendant:
Dennis P. Glascott, Melissa Kapuszcak, Grant Zajas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quintero Gomez v. Unilife Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv03986
Plaintiff:
Manuel A. Quintero Gomez
Defendant:
Unilife Corporation, Alan Shortall, John Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
