Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rivers v. Janica
as 6:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Rivers
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelly Janica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03921
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Richardson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00470
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Patterson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Smith
as 4:2020cv00139
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Sheriff Royce Glenn Smith
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Herbert J. Boyte Jr. et al
as 4:2016cv02911
Defendant:
Herbert J. Boyte Jr, Jodie Boyte, Dennis Lee Locke doing business as Lynns Longbranch and others
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Giddings v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv00219
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Giddings
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris v. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. dba BRP et al
as 1:2008cv00525
Defendant:
Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. dba BRP and Dennis Lee d/b/a Triple L Powersports, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Megan Leigh Norris
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Joiner v. Quarterman
as 7:2008cv00096
Petitioner:
Dennis Lee Joiner
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cain v. Quarterman
as 2:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Denny Lee Cain
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
