Cases 1 - 10 of 135
ManhattanLife Insurance and Annuity Company et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
ManhattanLife Insurance and Annuity Company, Paschall and Associates, Inc. and William C. Paschall
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Treasury, Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Council for Medicare Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Council for Medicare Choice, Fort Worth Association of Health Underwriters, Inc. and Vogue Insurance Agency LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Americans for Beneficiary Choice et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Americans for Beneficiary Choice and Senior Security Benefits, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Baylor All Saints Medical Center et al v. Becerra
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Baylor All Saints Medical Center doing business as Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center - Fort Worth, Baylor Medical Center at Irving doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Irving, Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie doing business as Baylor Scott & White Medical Center Waxahachie and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Roesel v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roesel
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jessica Smith, Joel Wallskog, M.D., Theodore Cabaniss, on behalf of his minor son, T.C. and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Robbins v. IMP Metro West, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tiffany C Robbins and Tiffany C Robins
Defendant:
IMP Metro West, LLC, Voyager Indemnity Insurance Co., Assurant Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Mesa Hills Specialty Hospital v. Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Mesa Hills Specialty Hospital
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Inc., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Reliance Behavioral Health, P.C. v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Reliance Behavioral Health, P.C.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
