Cases 11 - 20 of 244
Raul Perez, et al v. USDA, et al
as 23-16139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL R. PEREZ, individually and as the Successor in Interest to the Estate of A.P., BRITTANY L. PEREZ, N. R. P., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem Brittany L. Perez and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gene Scott, II v. USDA, et al
as 23-16058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT II
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as ARBA, U.S. Gaming Comm.
USA, et al v. Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc., et al
as 23-16054
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA on behalf of RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE ("RUS"), an agency of the Department of Agriculture on behalf of Rural Utilities Service
Appellant:
TAMASHIRO SOGI & BONNER, ALC
Defendant:
SANDWICH ISLES COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ALBERT S.N. HEE, JANEEN-ANN OLDS and others
Appellee:
FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, LTD., Garnishee
M & T Farms v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, et al
as 23-15837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M & T FARMS, a California General Partnership
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION, a wholly owned government corporation that administers the Federal crop insurance program and RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY, the United States Department of Agricultures agency that manages the FCIC and administers Federal crop insurance policies
Friends of the Clearwater v. Cheryl Probert, et al
as 23-35070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER, a non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
CHERYL F. PROBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
IDAHO RECREATION COUNCIL, INC., PUBLIC LAND ACCESS YEAR-ROUND and IDAHO STATE ATV ASSOCIATION
Round Lake Farms, LLC v. NRCS, et al
as 22-36028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROUND LAKE FARMS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Natural Grocers, et al v. Thomas Vilsack, et al
as 22-16770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATURAL GROCERS, CITIZENS FOR GMO LABELING, LABEL GMOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS VILSACK, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, BRUCE SUMMERS, Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, UNITED STATES BEET SUGAR ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN SUGARBEET GROWERS ASSOCIATION
Amicus Curiae:
NON-GMO PROJECT and HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE
BMBP v. Shane Jeffries, et al
as 22-35857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
SHANE JEFFRIES, in his official capacity as Ochoco National Forest Supervisor and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Daniel St. John, et al v. County of Kootenai, et al
as 22-35662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ST. JOHN and DAWN WORKMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF KOOTENAI, KOOTENAI COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BENJAMIN WOLFINGER, individually and in his official capacity as the Kootenai County Sheriff and others
Friends of the Crazy Mountains, et al v. Mary Erickson, et al
as 22-35555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE CRAZY MOUNTAINS, a public land organization, MONTANA CHAPTER BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS, a non-profit organization, ENHANCING MONTANA'S WILDLIFE AND HABITAT, a public outreach organization and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY ERICKSON, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Custer Gallatin National Forest, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, Region One, for the U.S. Forest Service, VICKI CHRISTIANSEN, in her official capacity as chief of the U.S. Forest Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
