Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Phillips v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Stephanie D. Phillips
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Agriculture and others
NOC Properties, LLC et al v. Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00170
Counter Defendant:
NOC Retail, LLC, Nantahala Outdoor Center, LLC, NOC Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
NC Department of Transportation, Swain County, U.S. Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Great Smoky Mountains Railroad, LLC
Worley v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Andrea L. Foster and Judith McKenzie-Abraham
Plaintiff:
Rodney T. Worley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Call v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv00229
3Rd Party Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Susan Hyatt Call
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutland et al v. Dugas et al
as 1:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
John W. Rutland, III , Joseph L. Ellen , Donna M. Ellen and others
Defendant:
Terri Hope Dugas , Anthony M. Milici, Pathumwan Milici and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Terri Hope Dugas
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Anthony Phillips, Joseph Hall and others
Counter_claimant:
Terri Hope Dugas
Counter_defendant:
John W. Rutland, III , Joseph L. Ellen , Donna M. Ellen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adams v. Adams et al
as 2:2012cv00089
Petitioner:
Ross W. Adams, Sr.
Respondent:
Nancy Elizabeth Adams , Mattie Carol Adams , Judy Mae Adams Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
