Cases 1 - 10 of 1,502
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIRKLAND v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY M KIRKLAND
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VOSBURG v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RG VOSBURG
Defendant:
JOHNSON, PERKINS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAPHOOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
DAVE GAPHOOR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
