Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Garrett v. Howard County, MD et al
as 1:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
Ismere garrett and Ishmere Garrett
Defendant:
Howard County, MD and Howard County Department of Corrections Jessup, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis, III v. Officer County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv02268
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Davis, III
Defendant:
Officer County Department of Corrections, Officer Parsons and Director Gail Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef
Snowden et al v. Prince George's County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Snowden , David Francis , Kevin Stewart and others
Defendant:
Prince George's County Department of Corrections, Mary Lou McDonough, Colonel Mark E Person and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mesmer v. St. Mary's County et al
as 8:2010cv01053
Plaintiff:
William R. Mesmer
Defendant:
St. Mary's County, Karen H. Abrams, Richard D. Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
