Cases 31 - 40 of 597
INSPIRATION MINISTRIES, INC v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
INSPIRATION MINISTRIES, INC
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Karkout v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv15789
Plaintiff:
Anas Karkout
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Darji v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kamalesh Darji
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur Jaddou, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
