Cases 41 - 50 of 258
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Shaw v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Orville Shaw
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alenezi v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Antony Blinken, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Plaintiff:
Salem DH O Alenezi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
McCall v. Frontier Airlines, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv00902
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security Claims Management Branch, TSA - U.S. Dept. Homeland Security and Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
George McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Bixler v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 3:2021cv00841
Defendant:
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and Commissioner of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Dr. Amy Bixler and Glenn Osowski
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 0557
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
