Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
COOMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03781
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH COOMES and JOHN COOMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
KIKENDALL-WILKINSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2012cv01676
Defendant:
ALL OTHER PERSON CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE REAL ESTATE WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS CAUSE OF ACTION, ARGENT MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, CACH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER KIKENDALL- WILKINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
PAUL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00349
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY PAUL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
