Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Buchanan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Sparks v. Torres et al
as 6:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Sparks
Defendant:
Major Claudia I. Torres, Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Speer et al
as 5:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Department of the Army and Robert M. Speer
Plaintiff:
Stacy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Department of the Army
as 6:2018cv00178
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Plaintiff:
Ms. Theresa Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00938
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
