Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Benjamin David Timpauer v. Jane Arellano
as 2:2008cv05298
Plaintiff: Benjamin David Timpauer
Defendant: Jane Arellano, US Attorney and US Dept of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Dmitri Tatarinov v. Superior Court of the State of, et al
as 08-56309
Petitioner - Appellant: DMITRI VALLERVEICH TATARINOV
Respondent - Appellee: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL, DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. ATTORNEY, SOUTHERN DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-16782
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at00402
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00794
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at00403
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00792
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00456
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01558
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Nagy v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv02227
Petitioner: Marga Nagy
Defendant: Michael Chertoff, Michael B. Mukasey, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?