Cases 1 - 10 of 15
D. William Thornton v. Los Angeles County Dept. of Mental Health
as 2:2021cv09490
Plaintiff:
D. William Thornton
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Dept. of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Izaz Khan v. Los Angeles Times Newspaper et al
as 2:2017cv04606
Defendant:
DMH Dept of Mental Health Headquater, Lauran Haspanic, Bangali Guy Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Izaz Khan
Lillian Joan Morejon v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv00930
Defendant:
Matthew Barazza, Matthew Barazza, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Lillian Joan Morejon
Aubrey J Demmings v. LA County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2015cv04090
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Demmings
Defendant:
Director of Dept of Mental Health, Deputy Sgt Grey, Deputy Sgt Grey and others
Donovan L Haley v. County of Los Angeles Dept of Mental Health
as 2:2013cv09178
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles Dept of Mental Health
Plaintiff:
Donovan L Haley
Herman Rene Ontiveros v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2012cv01921
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Evans, Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Rene Ontiveros
Florzell Thomas, Jr. v. California Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv04020
Respondent:
California Dept of Corrections, California Dept of Mental Health, O. Martia and others
Petitioner:
Florzell Thomas, Jr.
Lorenzo Real et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2009cv03770
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Real and Leigh Real
Defendant:
State of California, Dept. of Mental Health, Atascadero State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillip L. Harmon v. Dept. of Mental Health
as 2:2009cv00911
Petitioner:
Phillip L. Harmon
Respondent:
Dept. of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip L. Harmon v. Dept. of Mental Health
as 2:2008cv01557
Petitioner:
Phillip L. Harmon
Respondent:
Dept. of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
