Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santiago-Aguilera v. State of DE/ Dept of Labor et al
as 1:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jorge Santiago-Aguilera
Defendant:
State of DE/ Dept of Labor, Harleysville Insurance Company and Davis-Young Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Neff v. State of Maryland et al.
as 1:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Neff
Defendant:
State of Maryland, ECI-E Prison Warden, Wexford Medical Inc Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States Inc. v. Cannon-Bey, et al.
as 1:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
United States Inc., State Of Delaware, Wilmington Police Dept. and others
Defendant:
El Alton Cannon-Bey and El Cannon Alton-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Biggins v. Delaware Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Delaware Dept. of Corrections and Correct Care Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harvey v. State of DE Dept. of Health and Social Services et al
as 1:2013cv00959
Plaintiff:
Frances Y. Harvey
Defendant:
State of DE Dept. of Health and Social Services and Goodwill Staffing Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Crichlow v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Keino S. Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
