Cases 41 - 50 of 796
Hines et al v. Skull & Bones Associations et al
as 3:2022cv00653
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Skull & Bones Associations, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Hospital and New Haven Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zografidis v. Richards et al
as 3:2022cv00631
Defendant:
CW-2, CW-1, Vanessa Richards and others
Plaintiff:
Konstantinos Zografidis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watson v. Connecticut, et al
as 3:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Granville S. Watson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Manchester Police Dept, Manchester Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. Tx. Parole Dept Director et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Tx. Parole Dept Director and Greg Abbott
Hamze v. New Jersey et al
as 3:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Nader Abou Hamze
Defendant:
State of New Jersey, State of Pennsylvania, Immigration Dept and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Iannotti et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Solange Martinez
Defendant:
Frank Iannotti, Waterbury Police Department, Fernando C. Spagnolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DiRubba v. DiRubba et al
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Luigi DiRubba
Defendant:
Anna Maria DiRubba, Marianne J Charles, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
