Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Harrison et al v. Williams et al
as 6:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
William Harrison, Jr. and Jeannette Harrison Murby
Defendant:
Jackie Williams, Kim Johnson, Dustin Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bilder v. Mathers et al
as 4:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
Barry D Bilder
Defendant:
Beth Mathers , Ruth Bilder , Church of Holistic Science, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2013cv00569
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peel v. Joint Commission et al
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
James E M Peel, Sr
Defendant:
Joint Commission, State Survey Oklahoma Dept. of Health, Network 13 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Enid Police Dept. et al
as 4:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Lynn Edwards
Defendant:
Enid Police Dept., Officer Bush, Officer Fuska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Alford et al
as 5:2011cv01353
Plaintiff:
Robert Nelson Clifton
Defendant:
Thomas H Alford, Larry Moore, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pryor Police Dept et al
as 4:2010cv00364
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shane Smith
Defendant:
Pryor Police Dept, Sue Ann and Sgt Blower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Rayl et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
James Fields, Jr
Defendant:
James Brian Rayl, Pete Silva, Tulsa Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Tulsa Police Dept et al
as 4:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Paul Morris
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Dept, J Lawless, S Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
