Cases 41 - 50 of 72
MILLER v. NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2020cv01107
Respondent:
NORTHERN DIST. OF ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. and others
Petitioner:
SHARIFF MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
as 1:2020cv00752
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
US DEPT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MACKENZIE v. CARSON et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
BEN CARSON, WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S DEPT. OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG STEVEN MACKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
OKEAYAINNEH v. U S DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
DIRECTOR/CHIEF OF HUMAN RESOURCES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE and U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
JULIAN OKEAYAINNEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREEN v. PRESIDENTIAL BANK, FSB et al
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
LINDSAY A. THOMPSON ESQ, US DEPT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, THOMAS MURPHY ESQ and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELSH v. U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv02121
Defendant:
U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE, KEVIN KREBS and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD WELSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01922
Defendant:
JUSTICE DEPT. and BARR
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
TARTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01615
Defendant:
SHELDON NAGELBERG, MANAHAR AWATRIMANI, ELIJAH MESHIAH and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK B. TARTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. N.C. DEPT. OF REVENUE
as 1:2018cv01380
Plaintiff:
JERRY LEE ROSS
Defendant:
N.C. DEPT. OF REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOORE v. U.S. JUSTICE DEPT.
as 1:2018cv01299
Plaintiff:
SURF MOORE
Defendant:
U.S. JUSTICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
