Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Clemmons v. City of Kansas City Mo Police Dept. et al
as 4:2010cv00897
Plaintiff:
Edward L Clemmons
Defendant:
City of Kansas City Mo Police Dept., Warren Miller, Thomas Marquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. State of Missouri, et.al.
as 6:2010cv03281
Petitioner:
Kevin S King
Respondent:
Al Luebbers, State of Missouri and Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. McSwain et al
as 2:2010cv04146
Plaintiff:
Jim Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain and Mo. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varnon v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv04057
Plaintiff:
John Varnon
Defendant:
Missouri Dept. of Corrections and George Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Missouri Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2009cv00817
Petitioner:
Ramelus Dejuan Bradley
Respondent:
Missouri Dept of Corrections and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wahid v. Mo Dept of Corrections
as 4:2009cv00697
Petitioner:
Hakim M. Wahid
Respondent:
Mo Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shive v. Mo Dept. of Corrections
as 4:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Merle Shive
Defendant:
Mo Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00007
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cole v. Mo Dept. of Corrections
as 4:2008cv00825
Petitioner:
De'Shonna L. Cole
Respondent:
Mo Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Conley v. Mo Dept. of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv06112
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Conley
Defendant:
Mo Dept. of Corrections, Roger L. Bennett, Jean Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
