Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parmlee v. State of CT Office of the Attorney General
as 22-1805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD T. PARMLEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPT. OF REVENUE SERVICES
Parmlee v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2021cv01319
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Parmlee, Sr.
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General and Dept. of Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parmlee v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2021cv01294
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Parmlee
Defendant:
Office of Attorney General and Dept. of Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tonina v. Revenue Services
as 3:2019cv00794
Defendant:
Dept. of Revenue Services
Plaintiff:
Theresa Tonina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
USA v. Winters et al
as 3:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
James Winters, Stacy Winters, Dept. of Revenue Services and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
USA v. Beaulieu et al
as 3:2012cv01623
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ricky Beaulieu, Connecticut Housing Finance Authority, Bristol Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Parmlee, Richard T., Sr. v. Revenue Services et al
as 3:2007cv00597
Plaintiff:
Parmlee, Richard T., Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. of Revenue Services, Jonathon L. Ensign, Paul M. Scimonelli and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Parmlee, Richard T., Sr. v. Revenue Services et al
as 3:2007mc00092
Plaintiff:
Parmlee, Richard T., Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. of Revenue Services, Jonathon L. Ensign, Paul M. Scimonelli and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
