Cases 1 - 7 of 7
TRONCOSO et al v. NEWJERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
as 1:2023cv16053
Petitioner:
DAVID TRONCOSO and MELODY TRONCOSO
Respondent:
NEWJERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATRINA TATEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
KOHLHAAS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv01564
Plaintiff:
LEIGH KOHLHAAS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , STATE POLICE DETECTIVE JOSEPH F. SEMBLER , DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL MARIE MCGOVERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JAYE v. NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN HOFFMAN et al
as 3:2014cv07471
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant:
NJ ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN HOFFMAN, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL lONE CURVA, THE HON. PETER BUCHSBAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFTEY, DIVISION OF LAW, JAMES BENNETT, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2008cv04620
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSE WILLIAMS and JOAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFTEY, DIVISION OF LAW, JAMES BENNETT, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, CITY OF TRENTON MUNICIPAL COURT, BOXING-SYNTAX=VOID-OMIT :ITELIC: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STACKHOUSE v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE et al
as 2:2007cv05502
Plaintiff:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, MAYOR ROBERT L. BOWSER, EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STACKHOUSE v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2007cv04403
Plaintiff:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, COREY BOOKER, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
