Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bahtuoh et al v. White et al
as 0:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dineaa Bahtuoh and Derrick DaSean Holliday
Defendant:
Jeffrey White and Kathryn Halverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forest v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03716
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Forest
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Spencer
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Merrick Garland, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hambrick v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2022cv02956
Petitioner:
Newland Derrick Hambrick
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoff v. USA
as 0:2022cv02919
Petitioner:
Derrick Russell Hoff
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harper v. USA
as 0:2021cv02771
Petitioner:
Derrick Angelo Harper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Goldmann et al v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department et al
as 0:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
Steven Goldmann, Romelle Smith, Mohamed Hussein and others
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriffs Department, Joel Brott, Donald Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddle v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2020cv01262
Respondent:
Department of Correction, Ramsey Co, John Choi and others
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Bosch
as 0:2020cv01163
Petitioner:
Derrick Z. Smith
Respondent:
Guy Bosch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Irwin v. Miles et al
as 0:2020cv00755
Defendant:
Kayla Taylor, Courtney Menten, Brian Ninneman and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry T Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
