Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Kendrick et al v. Allison-Smith Company, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Floyd D Kendrick , Steve Cartright , Kevin F Smith and others
Defendant:
Allison-Smith Company, LLC , Oklahoma Electrical Supply Company , Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Walker v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
Derrick G Walker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barham v. Toney et al
as 6:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Derrick Barham
Defendant:
Robert Donald Toney , MCM Enterprises, LLC and Canal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
EKJ et al v. Roberts et al
as 5:2014cv00906
Plaintiff:
EKJ and CMM
Defendant:
Eric Roberts, Derrick Lynn Ware, Steven Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv00795
Plaintiff:
Donald Derrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Parks v. Watts et al
as 5:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Allen Alexander Parks
Defendant:
Kyla R Watts, Derrick Carother, William Gebur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2013cv00935
Petitioner:
Derrick Johnson
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2013cv00866
Petitioner:
Derrick Dewayne Parker
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Kirtman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Derrick Eugene Kirtman
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution El Reno OK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horner v. Martin
as 4:2013cv00390
Petitioner:
Derrick Deondray Horner
Respondent:
Terry Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
