Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Neely v. QBE Insurance Corporation
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Derrick A. Neely
Defendant:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Neely v. QBE Insurance Corporation
as 1:2019cv01020
Defendant:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Derrick A. Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derrick Neely-Beytarik-El v. Daniel Conley, et al
as 17-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL L. CONLEY, Disciplinary Hearing Screening Officer, RICHARD SIDWELL, Disciplinary Hearing Board Chairman and DAVID SMITH
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv01023
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick D. Neely-Beytarik-El v. Dushan Zatecky
as 16-1420
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01522
Defendant:
OFFICER D. CONLEY, WENDY KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00363
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv00216
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv00060
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DERRICK DION NEELY-BEY TARIK-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Neely-Beytarik-El v. Marion Superior Court, et al
as 13-2560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK D. NEELY-BEYTARIK-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT, Criminal Division, MARK D. STONER, Judge, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
