Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniels v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)(MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Gwendolyn Babers, Officer Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Salter (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Sgt. Salter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Clevon Randolph, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Peterson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Officer Peterson, Officer Debose, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Watson (INMATE 1)
as 1:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Dr. Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Laster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Captain Laster, Lt. Langley, Sgt. Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ventress Correctional Facility, Karen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Lt. Radalphe, Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
