Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Williams v. Karandy
as 1:2023cv07376
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
David Karandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dinello et al
as 1:2023cv03608
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
David Dinello, Yelena Korobkova, Albert Acrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States
as 1:2019cv06308
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Allen et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv08173
Plaintiff:
Spencer Jackson, Wayne Stewart, Peter Allen and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Mantaro, MD, John Doe #2, MD, Jon Miller, MD and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00764
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
John and Jane 1 through 10 Doe and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv09911
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department Of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv03502
Plaintiff:
Derrick Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675
Barnes v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv02571
Plaintiff:
Richard Barnes
Defendant:
Derrick Williams, John Doe and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hong v. City of New York ("City") et al
as 1:2015cv05697
Plaintiff:
Keesoo Hong
Defendant:
City of New York , Derrick Williams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
