Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Marvin Flemings v. Pamela Moran, et al
as 12-3438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN FLEMINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA MORAN, Correctional Officer, Lawrence Correctional Center, DERWIN L. RYKER, Warden, Lawrence Correctional Center, MELODY J. FORD, Correctional Officer, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Flemings v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2012cv01001
Plaintiff:
Marvin Flemings
Defendant:
C/O Jenkins, Pamela Moran, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont G. Thomas v. Michael Puisis, et al
as 11-3169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT G. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PUISIS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, JAMES SLEDGE and others
Mcdonald v. Lovell et al
as 3:2011cv00762
Plaintiff:
Jimi P Mcdonald
Defendant:
Robert Lovell, A Dallas, Rick Densmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Cecil et al
as 3:2011cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jimi P McDonald
Defendant:
Heather Cecil, Joyce Hoskinson, Jeane Campanella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Bayler et al
as 3:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark Gaines
Defendant:
Randall Bayler, C/O Harmon and Derwin L. Ryker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Ryker et al
as 3:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ford
Defendant:
Derwin L. Ryker, Assistant Warden Hodges, Assistant Warden Campenella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A. Delapaz v. Derwin Ryker, et al
as 10-1842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A. PAUL DELAPAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DERWIN L. RYKER, MAJOR HALL, MAJOR HARRIS and others
Mannie Maddox v. Timothy Love, et al
as 10-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANNIE MADDOX
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY LOVE, JASON GARNETT and DERWIN L. RYKER
Ross v. Ryker et al
as 1:2009cv02854
Petitioner:
Timothy Ross
Respondent:
Derwin L. Ryker and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
