Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff: A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant: AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party: American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner: Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent: Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master: Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor: Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant: Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Wire Harness - Lead Case
as 2:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: Ifeoma Adams, Jude Anheluk, Archer-Perdue, Inc., d/b/a Archer-Perdue Suzuki and others
Defendant: American Furukawa, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
In Re: Wire Harness - Lead Case
Interested Party: Mitsuba Corporation and American Mitsuba Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Grupo Antolin North America, Incorporated
F. RUGGIERO & SONS, INC. et al v. NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03306
Plaintiff: RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF OHIO, INC., Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC, Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. and others
Defendant: TOYOFUJI SHIPPING CO. LTD., COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES S.A., NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. and others
In Re: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv14721
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd. and Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv14719
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. and TOYO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS (USA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Inverters - Dealership Actions We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01802
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc., Denso Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Automotive Constant Velocity Joint Boot Products - Dealership Actions We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02902
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD. and TOYO AUTOMOTIVE PARTS (USA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv14721
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Hitachi Automotive Systems, Ltd., Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc., Denso Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Valeo S.A. et al
as 2:2014cv10796
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: Valeo S.A., Valeo Japan Co., Ltd., Valeo Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. DENSO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv10776
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc. and others
Defendant: DENSO CORPORATION, ASMO CO., LTD, ASMO NORTH AMERICA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?