Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv10555
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Foistner v. FMC Devens, Warden
as 1:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Foistner
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeLaCruz v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv12261
Petitioner:
Edward Brailey Delacruz
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torres Rojas v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv11979
Petitioner:
Johanny Torres Rojas
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sheehan v. FMC Devens Warden
as 1:2023cv11959
Petitioner:
Daniel Sheehan
Respondent:
FMC Devens Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Bureau Of Prisions et al
as 4:2020cv40059
Respondent:
Devens Warden, Federal Medical Center, Bureau Of Prisions and others
Petitioner:
Albert L. Johnson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. FMC Devens, Warden et al
as 1:2015fp00213
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden and US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wherry v. Bennett, et al
as 12-2337
Appellant:
BENJAMIN J. WHERRY
Defendant:
LISA LIASON, BENNETT, FMC Devens Education Staff Member, THOMAS KANE, BOP Acting Director for Department of Justice and others
Appellee:
CHAPMAN, Records Office Supervisor, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, GALLANT, Case Manager for FMC Devens H-Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
