Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DOMINGUEZ v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04971
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, TRANS UNION, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE DOMINGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ditech Financial LLC v. Kline et al
as 4:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
Ditech Financial LLC
Defendant:
Warren B. Kline and Harry A. Kline
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
COBB v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
KEITH B. COBB, SR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ROMAN v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
JASON ROMAN
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC , BANK OF AMERICA and DITECH FINANCIAL-GREEN TREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAUSO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2017cv04721
Plaintiff:
GENNARO RAUSO
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ, DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MARY MCFALL HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Darbouze et al v. DiTech Financial, LLC
as 3:2017cv01664
Plaintiff:
Roberte Darbouze and Jean O. Duclair
Defendant:
DiTech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIPIERO v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03567
Plaintiff:
PATTI GIACHETTI DIPIERO
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
