Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Robinson v. Ms. Cooper et al
as 5:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Cooper, K Cash, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dial et al v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co.
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael Dial and Constance Dial
Defendant:
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Smith et al v. Saint Paul Travelers Company Inc.
as 1:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Davis v. Birmingham City Jail
as 2:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shawn Davis
Defendant:
Birmingham City Jail, Harper, Shelby and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Blackwell Towing
as 1:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dial Jordan
Defendant:
Blackwell Towing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berry et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Susan Berry , Jackie Brewster , Alex Brown and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Cardaryl Freeman
Defendant:
Gerald Allen, Billy Beasley, Scott Beason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dial v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Stephen Allen Dial
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dial v. Pulliam et al
as 4:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Winston Dial
Defendant:
Teresa Tanner Pulliam and James H. Hard, IV
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
