Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments (Charger Properties)
as 2:2024cv10667
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apartments (Charger Properties)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diamond v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2023cv12464
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Bank, Riverbend Apartments, Charger Properties and others
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments et al
as 2:2023cv11353
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apartments, Charger Properties and Piper Law
Diamond Funding Investors, LLC v. Marano
as 5:2023cv11115
Plaintiff:
Diamond Funding Investors, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Marano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Diamond v. Riverbend Apartments
as 2:2023cv10665
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apartments
Currency $30,340.00 US Currency et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023mc50247
In Re:
Currency $30,340.00 US Currency, Miscellaneous Firearms & Ammunition and Stainless Steel Byzantine Necklace with White Gold Custom Diamond Pendant
Claimant:
Kyree Wilson and Tiffany Wilson
Diamond v. Riverbend Apts et al
as 2:2023cv10005
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Riverbend Apts and Charger Properties
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. $53,186.00 in United States Currency, et al.
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$53,186.00 in United States Currency, Tapper's Jewelry 18K Rose Gold 50 Round Brilliant Diamond Bracelet, Breitling 18K Stainless Steel Rose Gold 42mm Chronomat Watch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
